[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 16, Issue 32 (9-2023) ::
3 2023, 16(32): 5-32 Back to browse issues page
An Analysis of Ahl-al-Bayt’s (as) Standpoint in the Prohibition or Approbation of Debating with Opposing Views
Mojtaba Moradi Maki1 , Mahdi Farmaniyan , Mohammad Javad Haji Abol Ghasem Dolabi
Abstract:   (510 Views)
debating is one of the conventional methods for pleading religious doctrine. However, some have caused detrimental effects by believing the act of debate to be against the ways of the Ahl-al-Bayt (as) by citing certain narrations surrounding the prohibition of debate and the condemnation of the debaters. On one hand, some believe for debate to be immoral and thus are reluctant to engage in it by referring to the ethically harmful consequences of debating. While on the other hand, there are numerous reasons to believe that debate, in and of itself, is approved by Ahl-al-Bayt (as) by upholding its evident practicality throughout Ahl-al-Bayt’s (as) lives while also researching narrations that encourage the utilization of this method. This study uses the descriptive-analytical method to examine narrative references to Ahl-al-Bayt’s (as) interdiction of debate to argue that the constant citation of these narrations contradicts Quar’anic teachings and remains in conflicts with Hadith convictions. Thus, by proving them to be irrelevant, the following paper offers recently developed realizations of these narrations in an attempt to resolve the created conflicts. Consequently, by the newly founded realizations, the very act of debate is endorsed upon by Ahl-al-Bayt (as) and the hadiths to disagree as such are presumed non-applicable as this research will separately introduce ten major founding aspects that ultimately lead the debate to an ineffective argument.
 
Keywords: Debate, Conflict, Prohibition of Debate, Approbation of Debate, Ahl-al-Bayt (as).
Full-Text [PDF 419 kb]   (317 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2023/09/22 | Accepted: 2023/09/1 | Published: 2023/09/1
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Moradi Maki M, Farmaniyan M, Haji Abol Ghasem Dolabi M J. An Analysis of Ahl-al-Bayt’s (as) Standpoint in the Prohibition or Approbation of Debating with Opposing Views. 3 2023; 16 (32) :5-32
URL: http://pnmag.ir/article-1-1742-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 16, Issue 32 (9-2023) Back to browse issues page
مجله پژوهش نامه قرآن و حدیث pazhouhesh name-ye quran va hadith
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4710