[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 18, Issue 36 (9-2025) ::
3 2025, 18(36): 263-288 Back to browse issues page
A Jurisprudential and Narrative Reflection on the Hadith Statement “Al-Sultan Zilullāh”
Ali Mohammadian1 , Mansoureh Arjmandifard
Abstract:   (6 Views)
The relationship between political power (governance) and legitimacy has always been a fundamental and challenging topic within the religious tradition. One of the contentious statements in this context is the hadith expressed as “Al-Sultan Zilullāh” (The Sultan is the Shadow of God), which has entered the religious heritage as a form of legitimization for rulers. Given the existing research gap, this article aims to provide a comprehensive and critical analysis of this narration through a problem-oriented study relying on library sources, evaluating the hadith from the perspectives of its chain of transmission (isnād), conceptual content, and semantic implications. The study’s findings indicate that, from the isnad perspective, the narrations of this hadith in Shi’a sources are disputable and lack sufficient authenticity according to narrators’ evaluation criteria, whereas in Sunni sources, the isnad of this narration (and narrations with similar content) is sometimes accepted. From a semantic and jurisprudential viewpoint, an absolute interpretation of this narration could potentially justify tyrannical rule. However, this study argues that limiting the meaning of the narration through the principle of customary reconciliation (al-jam‘ mahma umkin awla min al-tarh — “reconciling whenever possible is preferable to dismissal”) and the interpretation of absolute narrations in a qualified manner is necessary, a position also supported by religious and rational teachings. Ultimately, the article concludes that only a just ruler is encompassed by the description in the narration, and obedience to a tyrannical ruler lacks religious and rational legitimacy.
Keywords: Al-Sultan Zillullāh, Political Legitimacy, Hadith, Jurisprudence.
Full-Text [PDF 373 kb]   (4 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2025/09/13 | Accepted: 2025/09/11 | Published: 2025/09/11
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mohammadian A, Arjmandifard M. A Jurisprudential and Narrative Reflection on the Hadith Statement “Al-Sultan Zilullāh”. 3 2025; 18 (36) :263-288
URL: http://pnmag.ir/article-1-2159-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 18, Issue 36 (9-2025) Back to browse issues page
مجله پژوهش نامه قرآن و حدیث pazhouhesh name-ye quran va hadith
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4718