[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 13, Issue 26 (6-2020) ::
3 2020, 13(26): 51-84 Back to browse issues page
A Criticism of the Orientalists' Views on the Common Link Based on Shiite Hadiths
Bibi Zeinab Hosseini , Elliyeh Rezadad1
Abstract:   (2266 Views)
One of the topics of interest to the Orientalists in the field of history of hadith and jurisprudence is the common link theory which deals with serious and various problems in jurisprudential documents and narrations. Some of these problems are: the common link of narrators, family documents, involvement of too old narrators in documents, back-ward growth of documents and argument from silence. This theory eventually concludes that, due to the policy of prohibition of narrating and compiling hadiths, jurisprudential narrations may have arisen from the minds of jurists and their time of origination is at the most the second century AH. Hence, according to the common link theory, the documents of narrations suffer from singularity and are considered weak. However, this study aims to critique and examine the views of the Orientalists on the common link theory by relying on Ja’fari jurisprudence and using the historical analysis method and reject the claim of the Orientalists that jurisprudential hadiths suffer from singularity emphasizing issues such as the authority of Ja’fari jurisprudence among Sunnis, Imam Sadeq’s (a.s.) access to Imam Ali's (a.s) book as a written jurisprudential source from the first century and the fact that some of the narrators claimed by the Orientalists to be the common link of narration were Imam Sadeq’s (a.s.) students. As a result of this research, two common link diagrams are presented as examples based on the method of the two Orientalists, i.e. Schacht and Juynboll, that invalidate the idea of ​​ common link and a part of the common link theory.
Keywords: hadith, jurisprudential hadiths, Ja’fari jurisprudence, Orientalists, the common link theory, narrators’ common link.
Full-Text [PDF 892 kb]   (1064 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2020/07/7 | Accepted: 2020/06/30 | Published: 2020/06/30
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hosseini B Z, Rezadad E. A Criticism of the Orientalists' Views on the Common Link Based on Shiite Hadiths. 3 2020; 13 (26) :51-84
URL: http://pnmag.ir/article-1-981-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 13, Issue 26 (6-2020) Back to browse issues page
مجله پژوهش نامه قرآن و حدیث pazhouhesh name-ye quran va hadith
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4713