[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 19, Issue 37 (11-2025) ::
3 2025, 19(37): 103-131 Back to browse issues page
Assessing the Possibility of Inferring Liability (Ḍamān) from the Ḥadīths Comparing the Sanctity of Property and Life
Mohammad Hakim
Abstract:   (66 Views)
Authentic ḥadīths that liken the sanctity of property to the sanctity of life—found in both Imāmī and Sunni sources—affirm the equal inviolability of human life and wealth. Jurists generally agree that these reports establish the obligatory prohibition (taḥrīm taklīfī) of any unauthorized interference with others’ property. The central question, however, concerns whether a declarative ruling (ḥukm waḍʿī)—specifically, the rule of liability (ḍamān)—can also be inferred from these texts. The dominant view maintains that the term ḥurmat (sanctity) denotes primarily a normative prohibition, not a legal liability, based on arguments such as the contextual consistency (waḥdat al-siyāq) of the ḥadīth, the restrictive role of ownership (ḥaythiyyat taqyīdiyyah), and the absence of necessary implication (dalālat iltizāmīyah). In contrast, the alternative view upholds that these narrations do, in fact, entail ḍamān in cases of unlawful property damage or loss. Using a descriptive–analytical and ijtihādī methodology, this study examines the authenticity, jurisprudential interpretation (fiqh al-ḥadīth), and semantic scope of these reports. By analyzing the graded nature of sanctity and respect (iḥtirām wa ḥurmat), the generality of the analogy between life and property, the distinction between property as wealth (māliyyah) and ownership (mālikiyyah), and the rational convention (‘urf ‘uqalāʾī) of compensating destroyed property, the research concludes in favor of the second view: that the narrations support the inference of liability (ḍamān) alongside moral prohibition.
Keywords: Sanctity of Property, Sanctity of Life, Respect (Iḥtirām), Normative Ruling (Ḥukm Taklīfī), Declarative Ruling (Ḥukm Waḍʿī), Liability (Ḍamān), Civil Responsibility.
Full-Text [PDF 400 kb]   (38 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2025/11/21 | Accepted: 2025/11/21 | Published: 2025/11/21
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hakim M. Assessing the Possibility of Inferring Liability (Ḍamān) from the Ḥadīths Comparing the Sanctity of Property and Life. 3 2025; 19 (37) :103-131
URL: http://pnmag.ir/article-1-2203-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 19, Issue 37 (11-2025) Back to browse issues page
مجله پژوهش نامه قرآن و حدیث pazhouhesh name-ye quran va hadith
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4731